From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932195AbbJMBdy (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:33:54 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f48.google.com ([209.85.218.48]:36144 "EHLO mail-oi0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751408AbbJMBdw (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:33:52 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:33:27 +0800 From: Boqun Feng To: Fengguang Wu Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, LKML Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [lkp] [PATCH v3 2/6] atomics: Add test for atomic operations with _relaxed variants Message-ID: <20151013013305.GC1009@fixme-laptop.cn.ibm.com> References: <1444659246-24769-3-git-send-email-boqun.feng@gmail.com> <201510122205.Uu3yljqf%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <20151012145652.GJ27351@fixme-laptop.cn.ibm.com> <20151012152914.GB18440@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> <20151012154224.GB1009@fixme-laptop.cn.ibm.com> <20151012160200.GA26481@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pZs/OQEoSSbxGlYw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151012160200.GA26481@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --pZs/OQEoSSbxGlYw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:02:00AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:42:24PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote: > > Hi Fengguang, > >=20 > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:29:14PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > Hi Boqun, > > >=20 > > > The base tree detection is based on the whole patchset's > > >=20 > > > - subjects > > > - touched files > > > - TO/CC list > > >=20 > > > Log shows the files and TO/CC are strongly related to powerpc, > > > so it looks a natural choice to apply to it. Especially you put > > > "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" in the TO list while Peter/Ingo > > > in the CC list -- that looks like a strong indication for powerpc. > > >=20 > >=20 > > Thank you for your explanation, so how about modifying the title to: > >=20 > > [PATCH v3 tip/locking/core 2/6] ... > >=20 > > also works? >=20 > Yes it will work -- that'd be the most strong hint. >=20 Great! I will use that hint in the future, thank you ;-) > > BTW, does this bot have more tests than 0day? I have pushed this > > patchset to my own repo and had it tested by 0day. >=20 > Yes, it runs git am, the resulted commits are feed to 0day for > build/boot/performance tests. If you've already pushed the patches via > git, the robot should have skip such duplicate tests on the emailed > patches -- unless there is a bug. I'll have a check. >=20 Thank you, so I'm not going to resend this v3 patchset, will use the subject hint for any future patchset ;-) Regards, Boqun --pZs/OQEoSSbxGlYw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJWHF9eAAoJEEl56MO1B/q4JxoH/05VDN2HFIp3X1LUTCcLn7lA zGttEIO+KeSbVXcaLA/LD2H1wQlRrHvXL8z9MUIx7Bfk3teNoq0u3woGclctfjec YXkaEdTUzmX/l+RYrhDWK9vyANIWoigudnEJTt2M7FoEb91QJhhCz/RMu/wJk6gc rBi/vDWCVnWxVV6WsQUTB+pdsC3xQ8ln6lXTyqauoOAevHzBuc7S6lvfEotWbVXm Vh5qULL3PV5BukV1hsXFbYALDLERIQarhJnNBP7WJN2nnBlzDW3hfbgD1SKVNvI1 TyPe9yAd55IG3/S0+ifY2pyD0ckK1hS9EhwivhTtQQgZ7KsbqwFX8lAIRGFsgQM= =ZLZI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pZs/OQEoSSbxGlYw--