From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752675AbbJNKA3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:00:29 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:58229 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751126AbbJNKA1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:00:27 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:59:51 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Liam Girdwood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar Message-ID: <20151014095950.GQ14956@sirena.org.uk> References: <11282238.AHmyWliPRj@wuerfel> <20151014082050.GQ17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20151014083707.GR11639@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <11240940.NHO2vFoJOz@wuerfel> <20151014090815.GS17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tV/+6PImfyFtriLg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151014090815.GS17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> X-Cookie: Do you like "TENDER VITTLES"? User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --tV/+6PImfyFtriLg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:08:15AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:00:20AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 14 October 2015 10:37:07 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > but apparently this is work-in-progress and the plan is to use it > > in 4.4 when the rest of the currently-under-review patches are merged. > And here I thought we had a fairly strong rule that we should not merge > unused code :/ The revisions are very minor (and are sitting in my inbox for me to look at just now), and keeping things out of tree just makes it more difficult to get them merged - it's one thing if things are getting in the way for a long time or have a high cost but that's not the case here. --tV/+6PImfyFtriLg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWHieWAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQk+gH/Rf65tFTCmlQtKikmnXf2/DV b/RTdvE5jhrFSPacIKgJWQZuAkFJIWb2LV8Px8Ciexag75/BFI5hr0jZAn83JrEc t8Yu/qyaHYqqnVAFipd9AwnBGFmfgowagzVK8vpMTuc3EdaG39Btx2Y3TWJ9Sc+7 VEhoKGVV6EFCkH1LWZauqKXGmdC3FO4njPblpM3wQ/wbhJOdLzw8/eaJzRhEImgt ICLtjJc+cG1l9WuGgnEmkwcQTwlsF23Httjf5gmPd64YwxDri/mXXa2zpYzPKuF2 Osx4nJHJYSu1zfxuIVYW864Du72g/o4h5fwf8kwzUy29S69NcDduh2UBpSoj/Ss= =/JIF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tV/+6PImfyFtriLg--