From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753537AbbJOPfJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:35:09 -0400 Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.242]:17081 "EHLO eusmtp01.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752263AbbJOPfH (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:35:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:35:07 +0200 From: Ludovic Desroches To: Alexandre Belloni CC: Ludovic Desroches , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: debug: update prompt for DEBUG_AT91_UART Message-ID: <20151015153507.GF26893@odux.rfo.atmel.com> Mail-Followup-To: Alexandre Belloni , plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1444807482-22797-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <20151015140445.GG3421@piout.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151015140445.GG3421@piout.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 04:04:45PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 14/10/2015 at 09:24:42 +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote : > > Add (read help!) to DEBUG_AT91_UART prompt. It is not obvious there are > > such useful information to set DEBUG_UART_PHYS. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches > > --- > > arch/arm/Kconfig.debug | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug > > index 259c0ca..589e724 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug > > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug > > @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ choice > > 0x80024000 | 0xf0024000 | UART9 > > > > config DEBUG_AT91_UART > > - bool "Kernel low-level debugging on Atmel SoCs" > > + bool "Kernel low-level debugging on Atmel SoCs (read help!)" > > depends on ARCH_AT91 > > help > > Say Y here if you want the debug print routines to direct > > Isn't the "read help" message from config DEBUG_LL enough? :) > It seems not. Up till now we had no description in the read help. Ludovic