From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753833AbbJPJ2l (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Oct 2015 05:28:41 -0400 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:13345 "EHLO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751512AbbJPJ2j (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Oct 2015 05:28:39 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,688,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="310810958" Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:28:31 +0100 From: Wei Liu To: Insu Yun CC: Ian Campbell , Wei Liu , , , , Taesoo Kim , Yeongjin Jang , "Yun, Insu" Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-netback: correctly check failed allocation Message-ID: <20151016092831.GK32638@zion.uk.xensource.com> References: <1444932148-15633-1-git-send-email-wuninsu@gmail.com> <20151016090521.GJ32638@zion.uk.xensource.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151016090521.GJ32638@zion.uk.xensource.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-DLP: MIA1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:05:21AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 02:02:47PM -0400, Insu Yun wrote: > > I changed patch with valid format. > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Insu Yun wrote: > > > > > Since vzalloc can be failed in memory pressure, > > > writes -ENOMEM to xenstore to indicate error. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Insu Yun > > > --- > > > drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 6 ++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > > > b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > > > index 929a6e7..56ebd82 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > > > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > > > @@ -788,6 +788,12 @@ static void connect(struct backend_info *be) > > > /* Use the number of queues requested by the frontend */ > > > be->vif->queues = vzalloc(requested_num_queues * > > > sizeof(struct xenvif_queue)); > > > + if (!be->vif->queues) { > > > + xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, -ENOMEM, > > > + "allocating queues"); > > > + return; > > > > > > > I didn't use goto err, because another error handling is not required > > > > It's recommended in kernel coding style to use "goto" style error > handling. I personally prefer that to arbitrary return in function body, > too. > > It's not a matter of whether another error handling is required or not, > it's about cleaner code that is easy to reason about and consistent > coding style. > > The existing code is not perfect, but that doesn't mean we should follow > bad example. And to be clear, I don't want to block this patch just because of this coding style thing. It's still an improvement and fix a real problem. So: Acked-by: Wei Liu