From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753794AbbJPKBI (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 16 Oct 2015 06:01:08 -0400
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:39311 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752495AbbJPKBF (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 16 Oct 2015 06:01:05 -0400
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:00:21 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        x86@kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
        Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
        Wolfram Gloger <wmglo@dent.med.uni-muenchen.de>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] compiler, atomics: Provide READ_ONCE_NOKSAN()
Message-ID: <20151016100021.GR3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1444739750-29241-1-git-send-email-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
 <1444988694-26043-1-git-send-email-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
 <1444988694-26043-2-git-send-email-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1444988694-26043-2-git-send-email-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:44:53PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> Some code may perform racy by design memory reads. This could be
> harmless, yet such code may produce KASAN warnings.
> 
> To hide such accesses from KASAN this patch introduces
> READ_ONCE_NOKSAN() macro. KASAN will not check the memory
> accessed by READ_ONCE_NOKSAN(). The KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN)
> is going to ignore it as well.
> 
> This patch creates __read_once_size_noksan() a clone of
> __read_once_size(). The only difference between them is
> 'no_sanitized_address' attribute appended to '*_nokasan' function.
> This attribute tells the compiler that instrumentation of memory
> accesses should not be applied to that function. We declare it as
> static '__maybe_unsed' because GCC is not capable to inline such
> function: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67368
> 
> With KASAN=n READ_ONCE_NOKSAN() is just a clone of READ_ONCE().

Would we need a similar annotation for things like
mutex_spin_on_owner()'s dereference of owner, or is that considered safe
by KASAN?

(its not actually safe; as I remember we have a problem with using
rcu_read_lock for tasks like that)