From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932968AbbJPPra (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:47:30 -0400
Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:46500 "EHLO mga02.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932471AbbJPPr2 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:47:28 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,689,1437462000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="812687357"
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 23:47:23 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <lkp@intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
        "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "kbuild-all@01.org" <kbuild-all@01.org>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
 warnings
Message-ID: <20151016154723.GA23531@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
References: <201510071151.hH4lMK2P%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
 <20151007024018.GA25534@sophia>
 <20151007031413.GA12931@roam>
 <CACRpkdYfX9LqO8jjdhsp-MxJEqwHRudpjMqZhyvLbgxeGs9SSQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYfX9LqO8jjdhsp-MxJEqwHRudpjMqZhyvLbgxeGs9SSQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 04:47:23PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:14 AM, kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c:151:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it.
> >
> >  Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
> >
> > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
> >
> > CC: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> 
> This is confusing, I mix up the mails coming from my pushed git branches
> with this new stuff that is obviously checking patches I haven't even applied.
> It's better if these kbuild fixes are sent as Re: to the mail ID of the
> patch so it appears in the same thread as the offending patch on the
> mailing list.

Hi Linus, the patch email does not start with "Re:", however it does contain

        In-Reply-To: <1444997709-57293-2-git-send-email-ck.hu@mediatek.com>

So it should show up in the same thread as this email?

        [RFC 2/2] drm/bridge: Add I2C based driver for ps8640 bridge

Thanks,
Fengguang