From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754485AbbJPPyd (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:54:33 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:55758 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753920AbbJPPxq (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:53:46 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,689,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="812691673" Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 23:53:11 +0800 From: Fengguang Wu To: Linus Walleij Cc: Alexandre Courbot , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , William Breathitt Gray , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kbuild-all@01.org" Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings Message-ID: <20151016155311.GA24534@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> References: <201510071151.hH4lMK2P%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <20151007024018.GA25534@sophia> <20151007031413.GA12931@roam> <20151016154723.GA23531@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151016154723.GA23531@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:47:23PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 04:47:23PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:14 AM, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > > > drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c:151:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it. > > > > > > Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically > > > > > > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci > > > > > > CC: William Breathitt Gray > > > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu > > > > This is confusing, I mix up the mails coming from my pushed git branches > > with this new stuff that is obviously checking patches I haven't even applied. > > It's better if these kbuild fixes are sent as Re: to the mail ID of the > > patch so it appears in the same thread as the offending patch on the > > mailing list. > > Hi Linus, the patch email does not start with "Re:", however it does contain > > In-Reply-To: <1444997709-57293-2-git-send-email-ck.hu@mediatek.com> > > So it should show up in the same thread as this email? > > [RFC 2/2] drm/bridge: Add I2C based driver for ps8640 bridge Sorry it's not that email, but here is the mutt thread view in my mbox: Oct 06 William Breathi (7.8K:0) [PATCH v4] gpio: Add GPIO support for the ACCES 104-IDIO-16 Oct 07 kbuild test rob (0.9K:0) |->[PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings Oct 16 Fengguang Wu (1.3K:0) | `->Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings Oct 07 kbuild test rob (0.7K:0) `->Re: [PATCH v4] gpio: Add GPIO support for the ACCES 104-IDIO-16 Thanks, Fengguang