From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: core: Allow specifying current consumption
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 10:09:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151017170938.GP24668@usrtlx11787.corpusers.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFqQEY64AToR0So72Sc4DtKhH5Sxff=oy8pDZZmw8O0aMQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri 16 Oct 05:55 PDT 2015, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 13 October 2015 at 03:00, Bjorn Andersson
> <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com> wrote:
> > This allows us to specify expected current consumption of the vmmc and
> > vqmmc regulators. This is needed to bring the supplying regulators out
> > of their low-power-mode while accessing the mmc.
>
> This indeed makes sense, still I need to think a bit more on this.
>
Thanks.
We can currently work around this by using "regulator-system-load" on
the vmmc regulator, but a proper fix would be nice.
> For example, can we allow these regulators to enter low power again at
> some times? If so, when and what should that current value be.
>
The regulator framework recalculates the total load on a regulator upon
enable/disable, but currently it doesn't depend on the state of the
regulator.
I talked to Mark about this a while back and he was positive to us
correcting this, so disabled regulators wouldn't count towards the total
load of a regulator. (So that still is on my todo)
The second option would be to do what is done in the Qualcomm codeaurora
kernels, where the regulators are never disabled and there's a smaller
current specified for the suspend case.
This would require bigger changes to the mmc core I presume, but the
naming of the dt properties support such future adaption.
> Moreover, wouldn't vmmc|vqmmc-active-current be depending what eMMC/SD
> card that is attached?
>
I would say so, I do however not know how to acquire or encode that
information. Any suggestions here are welcome.
Regards,
Bjorn
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-17 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-01 4:38 [PATCH] mmc: core: Set load on vmmc and vqmmc Bjorn Andersson
2015-07-01 10:59 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-02 18:10 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-10-13 1:00 ` [PATCH v2] mmc: core: Allow specifying current consumption Bjorn Andersson
2015-10-16 12:55 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-10-17 17:09 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151017170938.GP24668@usrtlx11787.corpusers.net \
--to=bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome