From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751663AbbJRTJb (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2015 15:09:31 -0400 Received: from skprod2.natinst.com ([130.164.80.23]:51807 "EHLO ni.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750714AbbJRTJ3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2015 15:09:29 -0400 Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 14:08:40 -0500 From: Josh Cartwright To: Moritz Fischer Cc: michal.simek@xilinx.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, atull@opensource.altera.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] Adding FPGA Manager support for Xilinx Zynq Message-ID: <20151018190840.GJ12756@jcartwri.amer.corp.natinst.com> References: <1445035350-3569-1-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1445035350-3569-1-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on US-AUS-MGWOut1/AUS/H/NIC(Release 8.5.3FP6 HF1218|December 12, 2014) at 10/18/2015 02:08:40 PM, Serialize by Router on US-AUS-MGWOut1/AUS/H/NIC(Release 8.5.3FP6 HF1218|December 12, 2014) at 10/18/2015 02:08:40 PM, Serialize complete at 10/18/2015 02:08:40 PM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2015-10-18_15:,, signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 03:42:27PM -0700, Moritz Fischer wrote: > Hi all, > > I've tried to address most of the feedback that was brought up, > the one thing I haven't looked at was the firmware format part, > since that was still in discussion. > So I'm still open to suggestions on how to handle this. Was there disagreement? I had thought we settled on limiting the handling the BIN format explicitly, the rest of the thread was about userspace tooling for BIT->BIN conversion. Josh