From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753426AbbJSOOL (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:14:11 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]:37941 "EHLO mail-wi0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751063AbbJSOOJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:14:09 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:14:06 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: "Theodore Ts'o" , "Paul E. McKenney" , Andy Lutomirski , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Christoph Lameter , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Chris Metcalf , Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [BELATED CORE TOPIC] context tracking / nohz / RCU state Message-ID: <20151019141404.GB8952@lerouge> References: <20151012184051.GB29127@thunk.org> <20151012204005.GI3910@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20151016170256.GA1432@lerouge> <20151017194500.GC2678@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151017194500.GC2678@thunk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 03:45:00PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 07:02:58PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 01:40:05PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:40:51PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > > This thread had fairly intense discussion for two days, but then went dead. > > > > > > > > Do folks think this is worth discussing at the kernel summit? > > > > > > I am very interested in discussing this. Of course, part of that > > > interest is due to the direct involvement of RCU code. > > > > Please don't talk about this without me. Context tracking is deeply involved > > and I haven't been invited to kernel summit. > > Are you going to be in Seoul for the Korea Linux Forum? (KLF > attendees are welcome to attend the dual-track technical sessions > day.) Neither :-) But that's fine, I'm usually not useful speaking design face to face. I need time and editor to stare at for hours before answering. So I'll wait for email/patches to come and either ack or nack :-) Thanks.