From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753704AbbJSPNl (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:13:41 -0400
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:37940 "EHLO
	mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751209AbbJSPNj (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:13:39 -0400
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:13:39 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah.kh@samsung.com,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.2 000/258] 4.2.4-stable review
Message-ID: <20151019151339.GE20364@kroah.com>
References: <20151018014729.976101177@linuxfoundation.org>
 <56250025.7070205@osg.samsung.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <56250025.7070205@osg.samsung.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:37:25AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/17/2015 07:55 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.2.4 release.
> > There are 258 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Tue Oct 20 01:46:04 UTC 2015.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.2.4-rc1.gz
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> 
> Compile failed:
> 
> 
>   CC      drivers/xen/preempt.o
> In file included from include/uapi/linux/stddef.h:1:0,
>                  from include/linux/stddef.h:4,
>                  from ./include/uapi/linux/posix_types.h:4,
>                  from include/uapi/linux/types.h:13,
>                  from include/linux/types.h:5,
>                  from include/uapi/linux/capability.h:16,
>                  from include/linux/capability.h:15,
>                  from include/linux/sched.h:15,
>                  from drivers/xen/preempt.c:12:
> drivers/xen/preempt.c: In function ‘xen_maybe_preempt_hcall’:
> drivers/xen/preempt.c:34:11: error: too few arguments to function
> ‘should_resched’
>         && should_resched())) {
>            ^
> include/linux/compiler.h:166:42: note: in definition of macro ‘unlikely’
>  # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
>                                           ^
> In file included from include/linux/preempt.h:64:0,
>                  from include/linux/spinlock.h:50,
>                  from include/linux/seqlock.h:35,
>                  from include/linux/time.h:5,
>                  from include/uapi/linux/timex.h:56,
>                  from include/linux/timex.h:56,
>                  from include/linux/sched.h:19,
>                  from drivers/xen/preempt.c:12:
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:93:29: note: declared here
>  static __always_inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset)
>                              ^
> scripts/Makefile.build:258: recipe for target 'drivers/xen/preempt.o' failed
> make[2]: *** [drivers/xen/preempt.o] Error 1
> scripts/Makefile.build:403: recipe for target 'drivers/xen' failed
> make[1]: *** [drivers/xen] Error 2

I've added a patch to fix this up, I'll do a -rc2 in a few hours to make
it easier for people to retest.

thanks,

greg k-h