From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757375AbbJVML7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2015 08:11:59 -0400 Received: from pmta2.delivery5.ore.mailhop.org ([54.186.218.12]:58950 "EHLO pmta2.delivery5.ore.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751774AbbJVML5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2015 08:11:57 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 963 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 08:11:57 EDT X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.6.8 io 69E0480047 Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:55:51 +0000 From: Jason Cooper To: Qais Yousef Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, tglx@linutronix.de, marc.zyngier@arm.com, jiang.liu@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Generic DT binding for IPIs Message-ID: <20151022115551.GI3953@io.lakedaemon.net> References: <561E2BE6.2090807@imgtec.com> <5628BE00.4020106@imgtec.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5628BE00.4020106@imgtec.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:44:16AM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote: > Is there anything more I can do to get more attention about this? I > think Marc's suggestion is more generic and future proof, if I send > RFC patches for that would this be better? Please do. thx, Jason.