From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753183AbbJWXWV (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2015 19:22:21 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:47037 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752929AbbJWXWU (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2015 19:22:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:22:18 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah.kh@samsung.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.1 00/46] 4.1.12-stable review Message-ID: <20151023232218.GB13904@kroah.com> References: <20151023174620.779720995@linuxfoundation.org> <562A99F0.70208@osg.samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <562A99F0.70208@osg.samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 02:34:56PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 10/23/2015 11:45 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.1.12 release. > > There are 46 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sun Oct 25 17:46:11 UTC 2015. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.1.12-rc1.gz > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > I am seeing the following compile error (was seen in 4.2.4-rc1) > > In file included from include/uapi/linux/stddef.h:1:0, > from include/linux/stddef.h:4, > from ./include/uapi/linux/posix_types.h:4, > from include/uapi/linux/types.h:13, > from include/linux/types.h:5, > from include/uapi/linux/capability.h:16, > from include/linux/capability.h:15, > from include/linux/sched.h:15, > from drivers/xen/preempt.c:12: > drivers/xen/preempt.c: In function ‘xen_maybe_preempt_hcall’: > drivers/xen/preempt.c:34:11: error: too few arguments to function > ‘should_resched’ > && should_resched())) { > ^ > include/linux/compiler.h:164:42: note: in definition of macro ‘unlikely’ > # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0) > ^ > In file included from include/linux/preempt.h:18:0, > from include/linux/spinlock.h:50, > from include/linux/seqlock.h:35, > from include/linux/time.h:5, > from include/uapi/linux/timex.h:56, > from include/linux/timex.h:56, > from include/linux/sched.h:19, > from drivers/xen/preempt.c:12: > ./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:93:29: note: declared here > static __always_inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset) > ^ > scripts/Makefile.build:258: recipe for target 'drivers/xen/preempt.o' failed > make[2]: *** [drivers/xen/preempt.o] Error 1 > make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > scripts/Makefile.build:403: recipe for target 'drivers/xen' failed > make[1]: *** [drivers/xen] Error 2 > Makefile:947: recipe for target 'drivers' failed > make: *** [drivers] Error 2 Thanks for reporting this, there's a -rc2 tarball: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.1.12-rc2.gz that should fix it, can you test that? thanks, greg k-h