From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S965020AbbJ0RHT (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 27 Oct 2015 13:07:19 -0400
Received: from mail.savoirfairelinux.com ([208.88.110.44]:38044 "EHLO
	mail.savoirfairelinux.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754187AbbJ0RHQ (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 27 Oct 2015 13:07:16 -0400
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:59:32 -0400
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>,
        Pavel Nakonechny <pavel.nakonechny@skitlab.ru>,
        Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Frode Isaksen <fisaksen@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] net: dsa: allow switch drivers to cleanup their
 resources
Message-ID: <20151027165932.GA21799@ketchup.mtl.sfl>
References: <562F8ED7.2000804@baylibre.com>
 <562F9AAB.8090202@gmail.com>
 <562F9BB1.8090700@baylibre.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <562F9BB1.8090700@baylibre.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Oct. Tuesday 27 (44) 04:43 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Hi,
> On 10/27/2015 04:39 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > On 27/10/15 07:48, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> >> Some switch drivers might request interrupts, remap register ranges,
> >> allow such drivers to implement a "remove" callback doing just that.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> > 
> > This should probably be a Signed-off-by tag, but there is nothing using
> > this, so you would want to introduce an user of this function in the
> > same patch series so we see how you intend to use it?
> > 
> >> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
> 
> Yes, I didn't know how to handle this since it was part of a larger patch.
> 
> I forgot to add this into the cover-letter but I wanted to send an RFC serie with
> your bcm remove patch and a mv88e6xxx remove experimental code.
> 
> Yet, the mv88e6060 does not make usage of this.

So this patch must be part of your RFC for module removal instead of
this patchset.

Thanks,
-v