From: Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@linux.intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] VFIO: Add a parameter to force nonthread IRQ
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:26:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151027212648.GA22916@jnakajim-build> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <562F43F8.1040101@redhat.com>
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:29:28AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 27/10/2015 07:35, Yunhong Jiang wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 09:37:14PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 18:20 -0700, Yunhong Jiang wrote:
> >>> An option to force VFIO PCI MSI/MSI-X handler as non-threaded IRQ,
> >>> even when CONFIG_IRQ_FORCED_THREADING=y. This is uselful when
> >>> assigning a device to a guest with low latency requirement since it
> >>> reduce the context switch to/from the IRQ thread.
> >>
> >> Is there any way we can do this automatically? Perhaps detecting that
> >> we're on a RT kernel or maybe that the user is running with RT priority?
> >> I find that module options are mostly misunderstood and misused.
> >
> > Alex, thanks for review.
> >
> > It's not easy to detect if the user is running with RT priority, since
> > sometimes the user start the thread and then set the scheduler priority
> > late.
> >
> > Also should we do this only for in kernel irqchip scenario and not for user
> > space handler, since in kernel irqchip has lower overhead?
>
> The overhead of the non-threaded IRQ handler is the same for kernel or
> userspace irqchip, since the handler just writes 1 to the eventfd.
IIUC, the handler not only write1 1 to the eventfd, it also invoke the wait
queue function, and the in kernel irqchip has different callback with the
user space irqchip, am I right? But I should not state that in kernel
irqchip has lower overhead since I have no data for it.
>
> On RT kernels however can you call eventfd_signal from interrupt
> context? You cannot call spin_lock_irqsave (which can sleep) from a
> non-threaded interrupt handler, can you? You would need a raw spin lock.
Thanks for pointing this out. Yes, we can't call spin_lock_irqsave on RT
kernel. Will do this way on next patch. But not sure if it's overkill to use
raw_spinlock there since the eventfd_signal is used by other caller also.
Thanks
--jyh
>
> Paolo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-27 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-27 1:20 Yunhong Jiang
2015-10-27 3:37 ` Alex Williamson
2015-10-27 6:35 ` Yunhong Jiang
2015-10-27 9:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-27 21:26 ` Yunhong Jiang [this message]
2015-10-28 0:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-28 16:00 ` Alex Williamson
2015-10-28 17:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-28 23:54 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-10-29 3:11 ` Alex Williamson
2015-10-29 9:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-30 6:16 ` Yunhong Jiang
2015-11-02 9:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-28 17:50 ` Yunhong Jiang
2015-10-28 18:18 ` Alex Williamson
2015-10-28 21:46 ` Yunhong Jiang
2015-10-28 18:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151027212648.GA22916@jnakajim-build \
--to=yunhong.jiang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®