mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] kthread: introduce kthread_get_run() to fix __nbd_ioctl()
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:37:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151028153707.GB22672@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151027002642.GA32444@infradead.org>

On 10/26, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 03:27:13PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > It is not safe to use the task_struct returned by kthread_run(threadfn)
> > if threadfn() can exit before the "owner" does kthread_stop(), nothing
> > protects this task_struct.
> >
> > So __nbd_ioctl() looks buggy; a killed nbd_thread_send() can exit, free
> > its task_struct, and then kthread_stop() can use the freed/reused memory.
> >
> > Add the new trivial helper, kthread_get_run(). Hopefully it will have more
> > users, this patch changes __nbd_ioctl() as an example.
>
> This looks horrible.

Do you mean the helper itself?

In fact iirc people asked for this helper before. It looks natural and simple.
kthread_run() can only be used if this kthread can't exit on its own.

> I think the real problem is that nbd is totally
> abusing signals for kthreads and that needs to go away.

I agree this code needs cleanups. And of course we can fix it without
new helper, but see above.

Oleg.


      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-28 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-25 14:26 [PATCH 0/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-25 14:27 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-26  7:33   ` Markus Pargmann
2015-10-28 15:27     ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-27  0:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-27  7:03     ` Markus Pargmann
2015-10-28 15:37     ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151028153707.GB22672@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpa@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome