From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Mohit Agrawal <moagrawa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf sched latency: Fix removed thread issue
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 07:27:21 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151102222721.GC10949@danjae.kornet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446462625-15807-1-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org>
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 12:10:25PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> If machine's thread gets excited (EXIT event is received),
Why a thread get *excited* when it received EXIT event? :)
> we set thread->dead = true and it is later on removed from
> machine's tree if the pid is reused on new thread.
>
> The latency subcommand holds tree of working atoms sorted
> by thread's pid/tid. If there's new thread with same pid
> and tid, the old working atom is found and assert bug
> condition is hit in search function:
>
> thread_atoms_search: Assertion `!(thread != atoms->thread)' failed
>
> Changing the sort function to use thread object pointers
> together with pid and tid check. This way new thread will
> never find old one with same pid/tid.
>
> I think we could change this to the sort based on timestamp
> of thread creation, once it's added within Namhyung's thread
> patchset.
Right. I'll work on the v6 soon.
As a work around:
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> Reported-by: Mohit Agrawal <moagrawa@redhat.com>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-o4doazhhv0zax5zshkg8hnys@git.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> index 0ee6d900e100..e3d3e32c0a93 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> @@ -1203,12 +1203,13 @@ static void output_lat_thread(struct perf_sched *sched, struct work_atoms *work_
>
> static int pid_cmp(struct work_atoms *l, struct work_atoms *r)
> {
> + if (l->thread == r->thread)
> + return 0;
> if (l->thread->tid < r->thread->tid)
> return -1;
> if (l->thread->tid > r->thread->tid)
> return 1;
> -
> - return 0;
> + return (int)(l->thread - r->thread);
> }
>
> static int avg_cmp(struct work_atoms *l, struct work_atoms *r)
> --
> 2.4.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-02 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-02 11:10 Jiri Olsa
2015-11-02 22:27 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2015-11-03 8:04 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-11-02 22:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-03 7:41 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-11-03 18:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-04 7:34 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-11-08 7:31 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf sched latency: Fix thread pid reuse issue tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151102222721.GC10949@danjae.kornet \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=moagrawa@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®