mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, ak@linux.intel.com,
	edumazet@google.com, acme@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf: fix RCU issues with cgroup monitoring mode
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 16:53:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151104155334.GM17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151104041219.GA12969@thinkpad>

On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 05:12:19AM +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> 
> This patch eliminates RCU violations detected by the RCU
> checker (PROVE_RCU). The impact code paths were all related
> to cgroup mode monitoring and involved access a task's cgrp.
> 
> V2 is updated to include comments from PeterZ to eliminate
> some of the warnings without grabbing the rcu_read lock because
> we know we are already holding th ctx->lock which prevents
> the cgroup from disappearing while we are accessing it.
> The trick, as suggested by Peter, is to modify the
> perf_cgroup_from_task() to take an extra boolean parameter
> to allow bypassing the lockdep test in the task_subsys_cstate()
> macros. This patch uses this approach to update all calls the
> perf_cgroup_from_task().
> 
> In V3, we change the boolean parameter for a pointer to a
> perf_event_context so we can check the ctx->lock explicitely.
> This is more robust, than passing the boolean to express that
> we know the lock is held. The code can change, and thus the
> locking assumption, checking lockdep_is_held() ensures,
> the proper locking is in place. Patch relative to tip.git
> at commit 57ef9fc.

So aside from the reported build fails; this is not suitable Changelog.

Also, please split it at least two patches; as there are at least the
two distinct issues here.

One is the perf_cgroup_sched_{in,out} thing, which requires moving the
rcu_read_lock bits around, the other is the timestamp bits which require
the ctx argument.


      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-11-04 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-04  4:12 Stephane Eranian
2015-11-04  4:29 ` kbuild test robot
2015-11-04  4:41 ` kbuild test robot
2015-11-04 15:53 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151104155334.GM17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®