From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: namhyung@kernel.org, lizefan@huawei.com, pi3orama@163.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf probe: Only call probe_file__get_events() when fd is valid
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 11:57:47 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151105145747.GQ13236@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446729565-27592-2-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
Em Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 01:19:24PM +0000, Wang Nan escreveu:
> In system with kprobe enabled but uprobe turned off, 'perf probe -d'
> causes segfault because it calls probe_file__get_events() with a
> negative fd (when deleting uprobe events).
>
> This patch validates fds before calling probe_file__get_events().
Wouldn't this shorter patch be more robust by deferring the validation
to just before using the 'fd' value?
The end result is that probe_file__get_events() will return -ENOENT in
both calls, so ret and ret2 will both be set to -ENOENT, as in your
patch.
Masami?
- Arnaldo
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
index 89dbeb92c68e..f04a8318a1a7 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
@@ -138,6 +138,9 @@ struct strlist *probe_file__get_rawlist(int fd)
char *p;
struct strlist *sl;
+ if (fd < 0)
+ return NULL;
+
sl = strlist__new(NULL, NULL);
fp = fdopen(dup(fd), "r");
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
index 89dbeb92c68e..e5dc8e62f0f1 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
@@ -169,6 +169,9 @@ static struct strlist *__probe_file__get_namelist(int fd, bool include_group)
struct probe_trace_event tev;
int ret = 0;
+ if (fd < 0)
+ return NULL;
+
memset(&tev, 0, sizeof(tev));
rawlist = probe_file__get_rawlist(fd);
if (!rawlist)
> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-probe.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
> index 132afc9..861aa89 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
> @@ -384,7 +384,11 @@ static int perf_del_probe_events(struct strfilter *filter)
> goto out;
> }
>
> - ret = probe_file__get_events(kfd, filter, klist);
> + if (kfd < 0)
> + ret = -ENOENT;
> + else
> + ret = probe_file__get_events(kfd, filter, klist);
> +
> if (ret == 0) {
> strlist__for_each(ent, klist)
> pr_info("Removed event: %s\n", ent->s);
> @@ -394,7 +398,11 @@ static int perf_del_probe_events(struct strfilter *filter)
> goto error;
> }
>
> - ret2 = probe_file__get_events(ufd, filter, ulist);
> + if (ufd < 0)
> + ret2 = -ENOENT;
> + else
> + ret2 = probe_file__get_events(ufd, filter, ulist);
> +
> if (ret2 == 0) {
> strlist__for_each(ent, ulist)
> pr_info("Removed event: %s\n", ent->s);
> --
> 1.8.3.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-05 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-05 13:19 [PATCH 0/2] perf tools: Two bugfixs related to perf probe Wang Nan
2015-11-05 13:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf probe: Only call probe_file__get_events() when fd is valid Wang Nan
2015-11-05 14:23 ` 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
2015-11-05 14:57 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2015-11-05 15:07 ` 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
2015-11-05 15:58 ` 'Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo'
2015-11-06 9:50 ` [PATCH v2] perf probe: Verify parameters for two functions Wang Nan
2015-11-06 10:03 ` 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
2015-11-11 7:00 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-12 6:43 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf probe: Verify parameters in " tip-bot for Wang Nan
2015-11-05 13:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Fix find_perf_probe_point_from_map() which incorrectly returns success Wang Nan
2015-11-05 14:08 ` 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
2015-11-05 16:00 ` acme
2015-11-06 6:28 ` 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
2015-11-06 7:12 ` 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
2015-11-06 8:30 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-06 9:27 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-06 13:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-08 7:31 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf tools: Fix find_perf_probe_point_from_map( ) " tip-bot for Wang Nan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151105145747.GQ13236@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=pi3orama@163.com \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome