From: Klaus Ethgen <Klaus+lkml@ethgen.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: Kernel 4.3 breaks security in systems using capabilities
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 18:22:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151105172259.GC9307@ikki.ethgen.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVBON+MTfiC1hAbbUudfpJeKWdvt1yGx=B7L+xQAmyn3w@mail.gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Am Do den 5. Nov 2015 um 17:19 schrieb Andy Lutomirski:
> > With the present way, that was no problem (for OSS). You take away the
> > SUID, set the capabilities and if the tool complains about not being
> > root, look into the code and remove that stupid thing. With ambient
> > capabilities, no one will see that the tool is doing such stupid thing
> > as setting all capabilities unless some trouble is seen.
>
> SUID is, always has been, and always will be a minefield. People
> writing SUID programs need to do it right. When the kernel adds a new
> API, doing it right includes not adding a buggy call to the API.
Thats right. But real world is not optimal.
> The ambient capability code explicitly zeros pA when running a SUID
> binary to avoid problems in which a SUID binary has unexpected ambient
> capabilities.
That is not the point. I do not talk about combining SUID and
capabilities. I even seen that it was implemented that way. I talk about
taking away rights from tools that don't need it.
> IMO the right long term solution is to just stop using SUID and to
> stop using any other mechanism that grants new privileges of any sort
> when execve is called.
Right. That is my intention.
> When you can boot a distro with no_new_privs
> set everywhere (including init) and everything works, then I'll think
> we've made considerable progress.
That might be a longer way to go. I also don't think it it fully doable.
You do always need some applications having special rights. But I like
to pick exactly that rights instead using sudo or SUID.
Regards
Klaus
- --
Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16 Klaus Ethgen <Klaus@Ethgen.de>
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753 62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=ffr7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-05 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-02 18:06 Klaus Ethgen
2015-11-02 18:38 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-11-02 18:50 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-11-02 19:16 ` [KERNEL] " Klaus Ethgen
2015-11-02 19:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-11-05 10:19 ` [KERNEL] " Klaus Ethgen
2015-11-05 16:15 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-11-05 17:17 ` [KERNEL] " Klaus Ethgen
2015-11-05 17:34 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-11-05 17:48 ` [KERNEL] " Klaus Ethgen
2015-11-05 19:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-11-05 22:08 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-11-06 13:58 ` [KERNEL] " Klaus Ethgen
2015-11-06 15:53 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-11-06 17:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-11-06 17:51 ` Casey Schaufler
2015-11-06 18:05 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-11-06 17:56 ` [KERNEL] " Klaus Ethgen
2015-11-06 18:18 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-11-07 11:02 ` [KERNEL] " Klaus Ethgen
2015-11-08 17:05 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-11-09 16:28 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-11-09 17:23 ` [KERNEL] " Klaus Ethgen
2015-11-09 19:02 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-11-09 21:29 ` [KERNEL] " Klaus Ethgen
2015-11-10 0:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-11-10 11:55 ` [KERNEL] " Klaus Ethgen
2015-11-10 12:40 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-11-10 13:19 ` [KERNEL] [PATCH] " Klaus Ethgen
2015-11-10 13:35 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-11-10 17:58 ` [KERNEL] " Klaus Ethgen
2015-11-10 20:39 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-11-10 13:41 ` Klaus Ethgen
2015-11-11 2:04 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-11-11 10:14 ` [KERNEL] " Klaus Ethgen
2015-11-11 10:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-11-11 11:13 ` [KERNEL] " Klaus Ethgen
2015-11-10 15:25 ` [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] " Christoph Lameter
2015-11-05 16:19 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-11-05 17:22 ` Klaus Ethgen [this message]
2015-11-02 18:52 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151105172259.GC9307@ikki.ethgen.ch \
--to=klaus+lkml@ethgen.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
--cc=serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome