From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Account certain kmem allocations to memcg
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:39:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151109143955.GF8916@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60b4d1631e3a302246859d6a39ac7c6d6cbf3af3.1446924358.git.vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
On Sat 07-11-15 23:07:09, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> This patch marks those kmem allocations that are known to be easily
> triggered from userspace as __GFP_ACCOUNT, which makes them accounted to
> memcg. For the list, see below:
>
> - threadinfo
> - task_struct
> - task_delay_info
> - pid
> - cred
> - mm_struct
> - vm_area_struct and vm_region (nommu)
> - anon_vma and anon_vma_chain
> - signal_struct
> - sighand_struct
> - fs_struct
> - files_struct
> - fdtable and fdtable->full_fds_bits
> - dentry and external_name
> - inode for all filesystems. This is the most tedious part, because
> most filesystems overwrite the alloc_inode method. Looks like using
> __GFP_ACCOUNT in alloc_inode is going to become a new rule, like
> passing SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT on inode cache creation.
I am wondering whether using a helper function to allocate an inode
cache would help in that regards. It would limit __GFP_ACCOUNT
penetration into fs code.
pipe buffers are trivial to abuse (e.g. via fd passing) so we want to
cap those as well. The following should do the trick AFAICS.
---
diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
index 8865f7963700..c4b7e8c08362 100644
--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ struct pipe_inode_info *alloc_pipe_info(void)
pipe = kzalloc(sizeof(struct pipe_inode_info), GFP_KERNEL);
if (pipe) {
- pipe->bufs = kzalloc(sizeof(struct pipe_buffer) * PIPE_DEF_BUFFERS, GFP_KERNEL);
+ pipe->bufs = kzalloc(sizeof(struct pipe_buffer) * PIPE_DEF_BUFFERS, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
if (pipe->bufs) {
init_waitqueue_head(&pipe->wait);
pipe->r_counter = pipe->w_counter = 1;
@@ -971,7 +971,7 @@ static long pipe_set_size(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, unsigned long nr_pages)
if (nr_pages < pipe->nrbufs)
return -EBUSY;
- bufs = kcalloc(nr_pages, sizeof(*bufs), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
+ bufs = kcalloc(nr_pages, sizeof(*bufs), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
if (unlikely(!bufs))
return -ENOMEM;
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-09 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-07 20:07 [PATCH 0/5] memcg/kmem: switch to white list policy Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-07 20:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] Revert "kernfs: do not account ino_ida allocations to memcg" Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-07 20:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] Revert "gfp: add __GFP_NOACCOUNT" Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-07 20:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] memcg: only account kmem allocations marked as __GFP_ACCOUNT Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-07 20:07 ` [PATCH 4/5] vmalloc: allow to account vmalloc to memcg Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-07 20:07 ` [PATCH 5/5] Account certain kmem allocations " Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-09 14:39 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2015-11-10 8:07 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-10 13:23 ` Michal Hocko
2015-11-09 14:08 ` [PATCH 0/5] memcg/kmem: switch to white list policy Michal Hocko
2015-11-09 16:45 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-11-09 18:28 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-09 18:54 ` Tejun Heo
2015-11-09 19:27 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-09 19:32 ` Tejun Heo
2015-11-09 20:12 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-09 20:30 ` Tejun Heo
2015-11-10 7:49 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-11-11 8:12 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151109143955.GF8916@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vdavydov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®