mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86, ras: Extend machine check recovery code to annotated ring0 areas
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:11:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151110221134.GC28172@agluck-desk.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151110112142.GD19187@pd.tnic>

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:21:42PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> You could save a precious indentation level here:
> 
> 	if (cfg->tolerant == 3)
> 		goto clear;
> 
> and add the "clear" label below.
> 
> clear:
>         if (worst > 0)
>                 mce_report_event(regs);
>         mce_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS, 0)
> 
> >  		if (no_way_out)
> >  			mce_panic("Fatal machine check on current CPU", &m, msg);
> >  		if (worst == MCE_AR_SEVERITY) {
> > -			recover_paddr = m.addr;
> > -			if (!(m.mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV))
> > -				flags |= MF_MUST_KILL;
> > +			if ((m.cs & 3) == 3) {
> > +				recover_paddr = m.addr;
> > +				if (!(m.mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV))
> > +					flags |= MF_MUST_KILL;
> > +			} else if (fixup_mcexception(regs)) {
> > +				regs->ax = BIT(63) | m.addr;
> > +			} else
> > +				mce_panic("Failed kernel mode recovery",
> > +					  &m, NULL);
> >  		} else if (kill_it) {
> >  			force_sig(SIGBUS, current);
> >  		}

That would be tidier ... the inside of the "if" has been gradually growing
with added recovery paths.  I had to fold the mce_panic() line to shut
checkpatch up.

But I'm not really sure what tolerant==3 people really want here. By skipping
the recovery code they doom themselves to hitting the machine check again.

-Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-10 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-09 18:26 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Machine check recovery when kernel accesses poison Tony Luck
2015-11-06 20:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86, ras: Add new infrastructure for machine check fixup tables Tony Luck
2015-11-10 11:21   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-10 22:05     ` Luck, Tony
2015-11-12  4:14   ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-11-12 19:44     ` Luck, Tony
2015-11-12 20:04       ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-11-12 21:17         ` Luck, Tony
2015-11-06 21:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, ras: Extend machine check recovery code to annotated ring0 areas Tony Luck
2015-11-10 11:21   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-10 22:11     ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2015-11-11 11:01       ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-12  4:19   ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-11-12 19:55     ` Luck, Tony
2015-11-06 21:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86, ras: Add mcsafe_memcpy() function to recover from machine checks Tony Luck
2015-11-12  7:53   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-12 20:01     ` Luck, Tony
2015-11-27 10:16       ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-08 21:30         ` Dan Williams
2015-12-08 22:08           ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-14  9:55           ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-09 18:48 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Machine check recovery when kernel accesses poison Tony Luck
2015-11-10 11:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-10 21:55   ` Luck, Tony
2015-11-11 20:41     ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-11 21:48       ` Luck, Tony
2015-11-11 22:28         ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-11 22:32           ` Luck, Tony

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151110221134.GC28172@agluck-desk.sc.intel.com \
    --to=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®