From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754206AbbKLLG4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2015 06:06:56 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:59244 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752679AbbKLLGy (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2015 06:06:54 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 12:06:44 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Borislav Petkov Cc: LKML , Alexander Shishkin , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Paolo Bonzini , Paul Gortmaker , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/pt: Test CPU vendor before loading Message-ID: <20151112110644.GY17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1447325772-4799-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1447325772-4799-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:56:12AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c > index 42169283448b..fa1262b025e7 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c > @@ -1129,6 +1129,9 @@ static __init int pt_init(void) > { > int ret, cpu, prior_warn = 0; > > + if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL) > + return 0; > + Does not apply; conflicts with: commit 73fdeb66592ee80dffb16fb8a9b7378a00c1a826 Author: Huaitong Han Date: Mon Aug 31 16:21:02 2015 +0800 perf/x86/intel/pt: Fix KVM warning due to doing rdmsr() before the CPUID test If KVM does not support INTEL_PT, guest MSR_IA32_RTIT_CTL reading will produce host warning like "kvm [2469]: vcpu0 unhandled rdmsr: 0x570". Guest can determine whether the CPU supports Intel_PT according to CPUID, so test_cpu_cap function is added before rdmsr,and it is more in line with the code style. Signed-off-by: Huaitong Han Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vince Weaver Cc: acme@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1441009262-9792-1-git-send-email-huaitong.han@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c index 42169283448b..868e1194337f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c @@ -139,9 +139,6 @@ static int __init pt_pmu_hw_init(void) long i; attrs = NULL; - ret = -ENODEV; - if (!test_cpu_cap(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_INTEL_PT)) - goto fail; for (i = 0; i < PT_CPUID_LEAVES; i++) { cpuid_count(20, i, @@ -1130,6 +1127,10 @@ static __init int pt_init(void) int ret, cpu, prior_warn = 0; BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct topa) > PAGE_SIZE); + + if (!test_cpu_cap(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_INTEL_PT)) + return -ENODEV; + get_online_cpus(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { u64 ctl;