Re: [PATCH] ARM: sunxi: Re-enable SID driver in multi_v7_defconfig

["Timo Sigurdsson" <public_timo.s@silentcreek.de>]

Hi,

Krzysztof Kozlowski schrieb am 17.11.2015 09:21:

[...]

>>> > @@ -450,8 +431,7 @@ CONFIG_MEDIA_CAMERA_SUPPORT=y
>>> >  CONFIG_MEDIA_CONTROLLER=y
>>> >  CONFIG_VIDEO_V4L2_SUBDEV_API=y
>>> >  CONFIG_MEDIA_USB_SUPPORT=y
>>> > -CONFIG_USB_VIDEO_CLASS=y
>>> > -CONFIG_USB_GSPCA=y
>>> > +CONFIG_USB_VIDEO_CLASS=m
>>> >  CONFIG_V4L_PLATFORM_DRIVERS=y
>>> >  CONFIG_SOC_CAMERA=m
>>> >  CONFIG_SOC_CAMERA_PLATFORM=m
>>> > @@ -465,28 +445,25 @@ CONFIG_DRM=y
>>> >  CONFIG_DRM_I2C_ADV7511=m
>>> >  # CONFIG_DRM_I2C_CH7006 is not set
>>> >  # CONFIG_DRM_I2C_SIL164 is not set
>>> > -CONFIG_DRM_NXP_PTN3460=m
>>> > -CONFIG_DRM_PARADE_PS8622=m
>>> >  CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU=m
>>> >  CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS=m
>>> > -CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS_DSI=y
>>> >  CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS_FIMD=y
>>> > -CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS_HDMI=y
>>>
>>> I would prefer leaving the EXYNOS_HDMI. Dependencies are now not enabled
>>> but we are fixing it in:
>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg93299.html
>>
>> I think the problem here is that I don't see this patch in linux-next
>> yet.
>>
> 
> Indeed... and I don't know when it will go there so actually maybe it
> should be removed... but in the same time removing DRM_EXYNOS_HDMI
> will probably make some conflicts because mentioned patch will go
> through Exynos DRM tree or Samsung SoC.

Since you suggested to split my patch into two, I might as well just
hold off the "cleanup" patch until Andrzejs patch hits linux-next.
Is that ok?


Regards,

Timo