From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161475AbbKSURA (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:17:00 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:35956 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161329AbbKSUQ5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:16:57 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 07:16:55 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Richard Guy Briggs Cc: Paul Moore , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree Message-ID: <20151120071655.3e5c113d@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20151119183012.GA1080@madcap2.tricolour.ca> References: <20151119120615.13b6ce0b@canb.auug.org.au> <20151119183012.GA1080@madcap2.tricolour.ca> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Richard, On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:30:12 -0500 Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > Stephen, your patch looks fine to me. I had some minor concerns about > deeper issues as to whether the original intent of that part of the > audit subsystem was affected by this change, but that is WRT the > conflicting patch rather than your merge. After poking around a bit, I > don't have any outstanding concerns. Thanks for checking. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au