From: Fengguang Wu <lkp@intel.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kbuild-all@01.org, jianchuan.wang@windriver.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, yang.shi@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 23:03:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151123150303.GA26066@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5653241F.4070704@linutronix.de>
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 11/23/2015 03:14 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>
> >> Need to add RT in the subject like "[PATCH RT]". Then perhaps Fengguang
> >> can have his tests either ignore these or test against the -rt trees.
> >
> > Yes sure. Shall I apply RT patches to this tree/branch?
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git linux-4.1.y-rt
>
> I'm going to get you your kbot branch where you run bisect tests and
> everything and tests the patches against. The problem with this one is
> that we will drop it (or leave it stale) once we move to the next major
> kernel release.
Thanks! Yes, a stable branch name would be better than "linux-4.1.y-rt"
that's like to become stable over time.
Thanks,
Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-23 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-23 7:19 jianchuan.wang
2015-11-23 7:30 ` kbuild test robot
2015-11-23 13:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-11-23 14:14 ` [kbuild-all] " Fengguang Wu
2015-11-23 14:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-11-23 14:58 ` Fengguang Wu
2015-11-23 14:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-11-23 15:03 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2015-12-01 17:59 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-12-03 1:53 ` Fengguang Wu
2015-12-11 17:24 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151123150303.GA26066@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=jianchuan.wang@windriver.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yang.shi@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®