From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754741AbbK0M33 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 27 Nov 2015 07:29:29 -0500
Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:51175 "EHLO
	mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754680AbbK0M30 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 27 Nov 2015 07:29:26 -0500
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:28:51 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Message-ID: <20151127122851.GO1929@sirena.org.uk>
References: <3399746.xt7N4lig0U@wuerfel>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v1TsIsr/WJoL6YzS"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3399746.xt7N4lig0U@wuerfel>
X-Cookie: A beer delayed is a beer denied.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: fix regulator_lock_supply regression
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


--v1TsIsr/WJoL6YzS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 01:04:30PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> As noticed by Geert Uytterhoeven, my patch to avoid a harmless build warning
> in regulator_lock_supply() was total crap and introduced a real bug:

This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.

--v1TsIsr/WJoL6YzS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWWEyDAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQPHQH/i3WwTo7jyeiONhj1DuhNWAz
tJ05FH6nmCUUgAno768QcEewq+5EB3PEC1zoKgzgFCX/MCGkUVEkilWIjmXcuIZd
+CXUcuJcDhbj91BayJX/e7oSeFSS3OMpCOwlQhjXJy+JRKnQ8hg1nklVVzmPnP5v
bvDL/YJSop3h+uSNtgsAsDhYHXCcsdp1arQ5VUwqCuZfOHPEXApBFf7LyvPmhI5N
iNZx++N8yRlEg0gzgrT71ARtNYYcxZyDAkyUaglzLJpalDwi2aieqdt2Pjxu20JC
rSmaxEltADkGiesFFavW+FdWaUfrR+mRLac+0nbPlpQDjEXq3RgGVGalNlXB/ak=
=MANy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--v1TsIsr/WJoL6YzS--