From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751757AbbK2XN2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Nov 2015 18:13:28 -0500 Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:40234 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751301AbbK2XNX (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Nov 2015 18:13:23 -0500 Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 23:13:03 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= Cc: Nicolas Pitre , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Ivaylo Dimitrov , Laura Abbott , Tony Lindgren , Sebastian Reichel , Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Pavel Machek , Grant Likely , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Frank Rowand , Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm: boot: store ATAGs structure into DT "/chosen/linux,atags" entry Message-ID: <20151129231303.GF30871@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20150713131902.GH26485@atomide.com> <20151129180939.GE30871@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <201511291919.18179@pali> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <201511291919.18179@pali> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 07:19:18PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Sunday 29 November 2015 19:09:39 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 12:34:23PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > Good. And Arnd likes the idea too. So we might be converging at > > > last which is a good thing. > > > > I disagree with the idea that there is convergence. There might be > > convergence towards an idea, but... Here's a mail extract, from July > > 7th, from earlier in this very thread: > > > > Pali: > > > Me: > > > > Are the ATAGs at a fixed address on the N900? > > > > > > Yes, in board-rx51.c is: > > > > > > .atag_offset = 0x100 > > > > > > and Nokia Bootloader (proprietary) store them to that address. > > > > > > > Can that be handled in > > > > some kind of legacy file for the N900 which calls save_atags() on > > > > it, so we don't end up introducing yet more stuff that we have > > > > to maintain into the distant future? If not, what about copying > > > > a known working atag structure into a legacy file for the N900? > > > > > > I already asked question if it is possible to read ATAGs from DT > > > booted kernel. And somebody (do not remember who) wrote to ML, > > > that it is not possible and it can be done in that uncompress > > > code. > > > > So you're converging on an idea that has already been rejected. > > That's not a good thing, IMHO. > > Or in other case show that such implementation is possible... Only those with the problem can do that. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.