From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@gmail.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: change nr_uninterruptible to be signed
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:38:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151130093822.GG17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448597384-28211-1-git-send-email-yalin.wang2010@gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 12:09:44PM +0800, yalin wang wrote:
> nr_uninterruptible will be negative during running,
> this happened when dequeue a TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE task
> from rq1 and then wake up the task and queue it to rq2,
> then rq2->nr_uninterruptible-- will reuslt in negative value
> sometimes.
Why!? Aren't isn't signed stuff more likely affected by over/underflow
muck? I'd be more inclined to remove the signed muck altogether like:
That relies on C having defined overflow semantics for unsigned types
and the (hard) assumption that the hardware uses 2s-complement (which
the kernel assumes in many many places already).
diff --git a/kernel/sched/loadavg.c b/kernel/sched/loadavg.c
index ef7159012cf3..62cff13ed120 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/loadavg.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/loadavg.c
@@ -80,13 +80,14 @@ void get_avenrun(unsigned long *loads, unsigned long offset, int shift)
long calc_load_fold_active(struct rq *this_rq)
{
- long nr_active, delta = 0;
+ unsigned long nr_active;
+ long delta = 0;
nr_active = this_rq->nr_running;
- nr_active += (long)this_rq->nr_uninterruptible;
+ nr_active += this_rq->nr_uninterruptible;
if (nr_active != this_rq->calc_load_active) {
- delta = nr_active - this_rq->calc_load_active;
+ delta = (long)(nr_active - this_rq->calc_load_active);
this_rq->calc_load_active = nr_active;
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 2eb2002aa336..2f9b4ce759dc 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ struct rq {
/* calc_load related fields */
unsigned long calc_load_update;
- long calc_load_active;
+ unsigned long calc_load_active;
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-30 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-27 4:09 yalin wang
2015-11-30 9:38 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151130093822.GG17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=yalin.wang2010@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®