mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: dma-coherent: use ioremap_wc() for DMA_MEMORY_MAP
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 17:15:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151204171554.GO10123@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4gti=49v4gUVjf=4nhxBCPPM3xmq6MQ2sBoBnKQbCS5MQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 08:59:10AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:20:26PM +0000, Brian Starkey wrote:
> >> When the DMA_MEMORY_MAP flag is used, memory which can be accessed
> >> directly should be returned, so use ioremap_wc() instead of ioremap().
> >> Also, ensure that the correct memset operation is used in
> >> dma_alloc_from_coherent() with respect to the region's flags.
> >>
> >> This fixes the below alignment fault on arm64, caused by invalid use
> >> of memset() on Device memory.
> >
> > This is indeed affecting both arm32 and arm64 systems.
> >
> >> diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-coherent.c b/drivers/base/dma-coherent.c
> >> index 55b8398..45358d0 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/base/dma-coherent.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-coherent.c
> >> @@ -31,7 +31,10 @@ static int dma_init_coherent_memory(phys_addr_t phys_addr, dma_addr_t device_add
> >>       if (!size)
> >>               goto out;
> >>
> >> -     mem_base = ioremap(phys_addr, size);
> >> +     if (flags & DMA_MEMORY_MAP)
> >> +             mem_base = ioremap_wc(phys_addr, size);
> >> +     else
> >> +             mem_base = ioremap(phys_addr, size);
> >
> > I wonder whether a memremap() approach for the DMA_MEMORY_MAP case would
> > be better. This API was added recently by commit 92281dee825f ("arch:
> > introduce memremap()"). It only supports write-back and write-through
> > but we could add a MEMREMAP_WC flag for this case.
> 
> I originally included both MEMREMAP_WC and MEMREAMP_UC as potential
> flags to this api, but ultimately decided against it.  The memremap()
> api is meant for memory that is known to have no i/o side effects.  As
> far as I can see WC and UC usages are a muddy mix of "sometimes
> there's I/O side effects, but it depends by arch and driver".  In
> other words we can't drop the "__iomem" annotation from WC and UC
> mappings by default.

In this context, the dma_declare_coherent_memory(DMA_MEMORY_MAP)
implementation is aimed at normal RAM with no side effects as later
returned by dma_alloc_coherent(). To me it looks like memremap is better
suited here for the DMA_MEMORY_MAP case. As per the
Documentation/DMA-API.txt:

  DMA_MEMORY_MAP - request that the memory returned from
  dma_alloc_coherent() be directly writable.

which means no __iomem. Of course, we still need ioremap for
DMA_MEMORY_IO which is supposed to be written with memcpy_toio() etc.

Which memory type should be used is left to the driver and it should
pass the corresponding DMA_MEMORY_* flag.

-- 
Catalin

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-04 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-20 14:20 Brian Starkey
2015-12-04 10:37 ` Brian Starkey
2015-12-04 10:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-12-04 16:59   ` Dan Williams
2015-12-04 17:15     ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2015-12-07 13:28       ` Brian Starkey
2015-12-07 16:19         ` Dan Williams
2015-12-07 16:47           ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151204171554.GO10123@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=brian.starkey@arm.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®