mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
	bobby.prani@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/2] Enforce RCU grace-period transitivity
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 15:41:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151204234125.GA21380@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)

Hello!

Within RCU, acquisitions of the rcu_node structure's ->lock field must
be followed by smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() in order to enforce RCU's
grace-period memory-ordering guarantees.  In theory, acquisitions for
debug purposes need not have smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(), but in practice,
anything other than fully consistent enforcement of this rule is a recipe
for disaster.  This series therefore adds smp_mb__after_unlock_lock()
for consistency:

1.	Create wrapper functions to minimize the number of these
	smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() calls, and apply these wrapper
	functions throughout.  Courtesy of Peter Zijlstra.

2.	Catch up wrapper-function application to patches that were
	in flight at the time #1 was created.

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

 b/kernel/rcu/tree.c        |  102 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
 b/kernel/rcu/tree.h        |   39 +++++++++++++++++
 b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h |   20 +++-----
 b/kernel/rcu/tree_trace.c  |    2 
 4 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)


             reply	other threads:[~2015-12-04 23:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-04 23:41 Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-12-04 23:42 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/2] rcu: Create transitive rnp->lock acquisition functions Paul E. McKenney
2015-12-04 23:42 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/2] rcu: Add transitivity to remaining rcu_node ->lock acquisitions Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151204234125.GA21380@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®