From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755674AbbLGGHj (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 7 Dec 2015 01:07:39 -0500
Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com ([209.85.220.45]:33593 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755580AbbLGGHh (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 7 Dec 2015 01:07:37 -0500
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 11:37:31 +0530
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Sanidhya Solanki <jpage.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: Skein: Moved macros from skein_block.c to header
Message-ID: <20151207060731.GB4122@sudip-pc>
References: <20151205063529.780bf436@gmail.com>
 <201512060035.GGCfWsZs%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
 <20151205222516.13a8baf6@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151205222516.13a8baf6@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 10:25:16PM -0500, Sanidhya Solanki wrote:
> I disagree with the output of the automaton. Included below are my
> compile checks before and after the patch.


Build fails with:
skein_block.c: multiple definition of 'skein_256_process_block'

And you moved skein_256_process_block() from skein_block.c to a header
file. Is skein_256_process_block() a macro?

regards
sudip