mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Cc: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@freescale.com>,
	"ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	"nico@linaro.org" <nico@linaro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ARM: SWP emulation: Restore original *data when failed
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:44:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151208104418.GB8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5666AF7D.5000703@arm.com>

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:22:53AM +0000, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> On 15/10/15 10:30, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > __user_swpX_asm maybe failed in first STREX operation, emulate_swpX
> > will try again, but the *data has been changed in first time. which
> > causes the result is wrong.
> > This patch is to fix this issue. When STREX succeed, change the *data.
> > if it fail, *data is not changed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@freescale.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c b/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c
> > index 5b26e7e..c3fe769d 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c
> > @@ -36,10 +36,10 @@
> >   */
> >  #define __user_swpX_asm(data, addr, res, temp, B)		\
> >  	__asm__ __volatile__(					\
> > -	"	mov		%2, %1\n"			\
> > -	"0:	ldrex"B"	%1, [%3]\n"			\
> > -	"1:	strex"B"	%0, %2, [%3]\n"			\
> > +	"0:	ldrex"B"	%2, [%3]\n"			\
> > +	"1:	strex"B"	%0, %1, [%3]\n"			\
> >  	"	cmp		%0, #0\n"			\
> > +	"	moveq		%1, %2\n"			\
> >  	"	movne		%0, %4\n"			\
> >  	"2:\n"							\
> >  	"	.section	 .text.fixup,\"ax\"\n"		\
> > 
> 
> I wonder what is status of this patch? I see that arm64 counterpart has
> landed in mainline, but I didn't manage to track down this one - is it
> because it never been submitted to patch system?

Most probably.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-08 10:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-15  9:30 Shengjiu Wang
2015-12-08 10:22 ` Vladimir Murzin
2015-12-08 10:44   ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2015-12-08 12:41     ` Vladimir Murzin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151208104418.GB8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nico@linaro.org \
    --cc=shengjiu.wang@freescale.com \
    --cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®