From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752537AbbLIBVP (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2015 20:21:15 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0074.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.74]:44294 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752104AbbLIBVO (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2015 20:21:14 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1567:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2693:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3622:3865:3867:3868:3870:3872:3873:3874:5007:6261:7875:8531:10004:10400:10848:10967:11026:11232:11658:11914:12114:12438:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:14659:21080:30054:30089:30090:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:2,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: force71_a98d741edb02 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1374 Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 20:21:11 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Michael Ellerman Cc: LKML , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, chuhu@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ppc: Implement save_stack_trace_regs() Message-ID: <20151208202111.79d60550@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <1449622985.6028.8.camel@ellerman.id.au> References: <20151208135056.718b7668@gandalf.local.home> <1449620422.6028.6.camel@ellerman.id.au> <20151208192844.70fb33e6@gandalf.local.home> <1449622985.6028.8.camel@ellerman.id.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 09 Dec 2015 12:03:05 +1100 Michael Ellerman wrote: > Looks like we actually have: > > #define kernel_stack_pointer(regs) ((regs)->gpr[1]) > > So that would be the most self documenting way to do it I guess, though I've > never actually seen that macro used anywhere before :) Cool, throw that in, and then it will be the first for you ;-) -- Steve