From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752584AbbLICxd (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2015 21:53:33 -0500 Received: from helcar.hengli.com.au ([209.40.204.226]:54013 "EHLO helcar.hengli.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750956AbbLICxc (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2015 21:53:32 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:52:42 +0800 From: Herbert Xu To: Tim Chen Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , "David S.Miller" , Stephan Mueller , Chandramouli Narayanan , Vinodh Gopal , James Guilford , Wajdi Feghali , Jussi Kivilinna , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] crypto: AES CBC multi-buffer glue code Message-ID: <20151209025242.GA24861@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <1449086565.22260.15.camel@schen9-desk2.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1449086565.22260.15.camel@schen9-desk2.jf.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:02:45PM -0800, Tim Chen wrote: > > +/* > + * CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC flag is passed to indicate we have an ablk > + * scatter-gather walk. > + */ > + > +static struct crypto_alg aes_cbc_mb_alg = { > + .cra_name = "__cbc-aes-aesni-mb", > + .cra_driver_name = "__driver-cbc-aes-aesni-mb", > + .cra_priority = 100, > + .cra_flags = CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_BLKCIPHER | CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC > + | CRYPTO_ALG_INTERNAL, > + .cra_blocksize = AES_BLOCK_SIZE, > + .cra_ctxsize = sizeof(struct crypto_aes_ctx) + > + AESNI_ALIGN - 1, > + .cra_alignmask = 0, > + .cra_type = &crypto_blkcipher_type, > + .cra_module = THIS_MODULE, > + .cra_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(aes_cbc_mb_alg.cra_list), > + .cra_u = { > + .blkcipher = { > + .min_keysize = AES_MIN_KEY_SIZE, > + .max_keysize = AES_MAX_KEY_SIZE, > + .ivsize = AES_BLOCK_SIZE, > + .setkey = aes_set_key, > + .encrypt = mb_aes_cbc_encrypt, > + .decrypt = mb_aes_cbc_decrypt > + }, > + }, > +}; So why do we still need this? Shouldn't a single ablkcipher cover all the cases? Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt