From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755306AbbLKMzd (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 11 Dec 2015 07:55:33 -0500
Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:38357 "EHLO
	ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752660AbbLKMzb (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 11 Dec 2015 07:55:31 -0500
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 12:55:28 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: Fix listxattr regression
Message-ID: <20151211125528.GJ20997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <1449836146-5674-1-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1449836146-5674-1-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 01:15:46PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Al,
> 
> the xattr cleanup patches which are meanwhile in your for-next branch broke
> listxattr on nfs.  Could you please add this fix?

Umm...  Would you be OK with folding that into commit in question?  I'd
rather not introduce a bisect hazard in the first place...