From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Jason Newton <nevion@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is PROT_SOCK still relevant?
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 19:39:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151214193954.10f3b0fc@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGou9MgKL7ff7Wr97U8xm3LuYBYRb02SGsho0x17tzkjEAgJPg@mail.gmail.com>
> Perhaps lets consider this in another way if it is strongly held that
> this is worth while in the default configuration: can it default off
> in the context of selinux / other security frameworks (preferably
> based on their detection and/or controllably settable at runtime)?
> Those allow more powerful and finer grain control and don't need this
> to be there as they already provide auditing on what operations and
> port numbers should be allowed by what programs.
That would be a regression and a very very bad one to have. The defaults
need to always be the same as before - or stronger and never go back
towards insecurity, otherwise they could make things less safe.
> Or how about letting port number concerns be handled by those security
> frameworks all together considering it is limited security?
There are already half a dozen different ways to handle it from xinetd
through setcap, to systemd spawning it, to iptables.
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-14 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-14 14:21 Jason Newton
2015-12-14 15:25 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-12-14 16:13 ` Jason Newton
2015-12-14 18:29 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2015-12-14 19:39 ` One Thousand Gnomes [this message]
2015-12-14 20:18 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-12-14 20:43 ` Jason Newton
2015-12-16 14:52 ` Jason Newton
2015-12-16 17:00 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2015-12-21 19:04 ` Jason Newton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151214193954.10f3b0fc@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--to=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nevion@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®