From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753340AbbLOMwY (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 15 Dec 2015 07:52:24 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37611 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751112AbbLOMwX (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 15 Dec 2015 07:52:23 -0500
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 13:52:18 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] perf tools: Try to show pretty printed output for
 dynamic sort keys
Message-ID: <20151215125218.GA30850@krava.brq.redhat.com>
References: <1450107973-2447-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
 <1450107973-2447-7-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
 <20151215090329.GE16565@krava.brq.redhat.com>
 <20151215103637.GZ6843@kernel.org>
 <20151215121320.GB12003@danjae.kornet>
 <20151215122426.GB20514@krava.brq.redhat.com>
 <20151215124231.GB25160@danjae.kornet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151215124231.GB25160@danjae.kornet>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 09:42:31PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 01:24:26PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 09:13:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 07:36:37AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > Em Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:03:29AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:46:13AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > > > > Each tracepoint event has format string for print to improve
> > > > > > readability.  Try to parse the output and match the field name.  If it
> > > > > > finds one, use that for the result.  If not, fallbacks to the original
> > > > > > output.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > For example, sort on kmem:kmalloc.gfp_flags looks like below:
> > > > > > (Note: libtraceevent plugins are not installed on my system.  They might
> > > > > > affect the output below)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Before:
> > > > > >   # Overhead  Command   gfp_flags
> > > > > >   # ........  .......  ..........
> > > > > >   #
> > > > > >       99.89%  perf          32848
> > > > > >        0.06%  sleep           208
> > > > > >        0.03%  perf          32976
> > > > > >        0.01%  perf            208
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > After:
> > > > > >   # Overhead  Command            gfp_flags
> > > > > >   # ........  .......  ...................
> > > > > >   #
> > > > > >       99.89%  perf       GFP_NOFS|GFP_ZERO
> > > > > >        0.06%  sleep             GFP_KERNEL
> > > > > >        0.03%  perf     GFP_KERNEL|GFP_ZERO
> > > > > >        0.01%  perf              GFP_KERNEL
> > > > > 
> > > > > hum, maybe we want some way to switch back to numbers?
> > > 
> > > OK.  Maybe something like 'kmem:kmalloc.gfp_flags/raw' ?
> > 
> > ok.. and some option that would make it happen globaly ;-)
> 
> How about '--raw-trace' then?

sounds good to me

thanks,
jirka