From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Add builtin_spi_driver() to avoid registration boilerplate
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:41:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151216174144.GN5727@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151216142117.GL2772@windriver.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1161 bytes --]
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 09:21:17AM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> Looking at the existing use case - in:
> drivers/video/fbdev/mmp/panel/tpo_tj032md01bw.c
> it would appear that the SPI driver is embedded within another driver
> that the author decided to make non-modular. Others that don't actually
> use the module_spi_driver macro but are also non modular are drivers/mfd
> wm831x-spi.c and stmpe-spi.c -- I'm guessing based on the above that you
> will suggest we convert those to tristate.
Well, the question you have to ask yourself is if the code really has to
be non-modular - what is the strong reason the code looks like this?
The panel embedding one driver in another seems like a bit of an
abstraction problem.
> At a more general level, if we have provided infrastructural helpers
> like module_xyz() then it seems sensible IMHO to have the parallel
> equivalent of builtin_xyz() so that we don't force non-modular code to
> require an include of <module.h> to build.
That really doesn't seem like the end of the world, and like I say if
we're not expecting sensible use cases it might even be a bad thing to
encourage people to do this.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-16 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-13 20:53 Paul Gortmaker
2015-12-16 13:23 ` Mark Brown
2015-12-16 14:21 ` Paul Gortmaker
2015-12-16 17:41 ` Mark Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151216174144.GN5727@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®