From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752000AbbLRKLQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Dec 2015 05:11:16 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39387 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750797AbbLRKLL (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Dec 2015 05:11:11 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:11:05 +0100 From: Jiri Olsa To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , David Ahern , Jiri Olsa , Kan Liang , Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra , Wang Nan Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 00/43] perf/core new feature: 'perf stat record/report' Message-ID: <20151218101105.GA670@krava.brq.redhat.com> References: <1450381644-25674-1-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org> <20151218084804.GD30339@gmail.com> <20151218085538.GE30339@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151218085538.GE30339@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:55:38AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: SNIP > > Right now if I do 'perf report' on such a perf.data then I'll get a "no samples" > TUI message, which is technically correct but somewhat misleading. > > It's no big deal - and maybe you guys can think of a better solution than > displaying an error message: maybe 'perf report' should automatically switch to > 'perf stat report'? > > It would be a bit shorter to type as well and would continue to strengthen the > very nice level of integration that the various subcommands already have today. > > But maybe it would be confusing - don't know. let's see ;-) I'll try to send out rfc soon thanks, jirka