From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: dvyukov@google.com, ajk@comnets.uni-bremen.de,
linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
jslaby@suse.com, syzkaller@googlegroups.com, kcc@google.com,
glider@google.com, sasha.levin@oracle.com, edumazet@google.com
Subject: Re: use-after-free in sixpack_close
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 22:02:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151218220204.6faf8e93@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151218.155954.26632223306803039.davem@davemloft.net>
> > Also you are at the point the tty is closing so the net device may be
> > active. Don't you need to netif_stop_queue() or defer the buffer
> > kfrees until after the network device is unregistered so you don't pee
> > into free memory if you have a transmit occurring ?
>
> I'm pretty sure that's what the semaphore down above this sequence is
> accomplishing. But if we do need the netif_stop_queue() let's do that
> as a separate patch.
Follow the code path for sp_xmit(). If sp_xmit is called it digs out sp
from the ndetdev, locks sp->lock and stops the queue then calls sp_encaps
which touches sp->xbuff.
So if one thread of execution hits sp_xmit and another closes the ldisc
at just the wrong moment then we have no protection.
Alan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-18 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-17 11:10 Dmitry Vyukov
2015-12-17 11:41 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-12-17 21:05 ` David Miller
2015-12-17 21:34 ` Ralf Baechle DL5RB
2015-12-17 23:47 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-12-18 20:59 ` David Miller
2015-12-18 22:02 ` One Thousand Gnomes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151218220204.6faf8e93@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--to=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=ajk@comnets.uni-bremen.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=kcc@google.com \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®