From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] perf tools: Add --raw-trace option
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:44:41 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151221084441.GB22464@danjae.kornet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151220145842.GA18893@krava.brq.redhat.com>
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 03:58:42PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:35:41AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > The --raw-trace option is to prevent pretty printing by event's
> > print_fmt or plugin. Besides that, each dynamic sort key now receives
> > 'raw' suffix separated by '/' to apply the raw trace to a specific
> > field.
> >
> > $ perf report -s comm,kmem:kmalloc.gfp_flags
> > ...
> > # Overhead Command gfp_flags
> > # ........ ....... ...................
> > #
> > 99.89% perf GFP_NOFS|GFP_ZERO
> > 0.06% sleep GFP_KERNEL
> > 0.03% perf GFP_KERNEL|GFP_ZERO
> > 0.01% perf GFP_KERNEL
> >
> > Now
> >
> > $ perf report -s comm,kmem:kmalloc.gfp_flags --raw-trace
> > or
> > $ perf report -s comm,kmem:kmalloc.gfp_flags/raw
> > ...
> > # Overhead Command gfp_flags
> > # ........ ....... ..........
> > #
> > 99.89% perf 32848
> > 0.06% sleep 208
> > 0.03% perf 32976
> > 0.01% perf 208
> >
> > Suggested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>
> I think the default is good with the 'trace' sort key as it is now:
>
> $ ./perf report -s trace
> 27.01% offlineimap:17701 [120] S ==> swapper/1:0 [120]
> 27.00% swapper/1:0 [120] R ==> offlineimap:17701 [120]
>
>
> But for '--raw-trace' option rather than displaying fields in the '=' notation:
>
> $ ./perf report -s trace --raw-trace
> 27.01% prev_comm=offlineimap prev_pid=17701 prev_prio=120 prev_state=1 next_comm=swapper/1 next_pid=0 next_prio=120
> 27.00% prev_comm=swapper/1 prev_pid=0 prev_prio=120 prev_state=0 next_comm=offlineimap next_pid=17701 next_prio=120
>
>
> it would be more readable to register all available columns as is possible to do now with:
>
> $ ./perf report -s prev_comm,prev_pid,prev_prio,prev_state,next_comm,next_pid,next_prio
> Overhead prev_comm prev_pid prev_prio prev_state next_comm next_pid next_prio
> 27.01% offlineimap 17701 120 1 swapper/1 0 120
> 27.00% swapper/1 0 120 0 offlineimap 17701 120
>
>
> it would be default output for 'perf report -s trace --raw-trace' command
>
> how about that?
I agree with the latter is much more readable. But the dynamic sort
keys are event specific while 'trace' is generic. So if there are
more than one events, dynamic sort keys should be generated for each
event and they'll show "N/A" for other events.
Also I don't like the --raw-trace option affects number of sort keys.
Maybe it'd be better adding 'EVENT.*' dynamic sort key for your case?
Thanks,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-21 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-15 15:35 [PATCHSET 00/10] perf tools: Support dynamic sort keys for tracepoints (v2) Namhyung Kim
2015-12-15 15:35 ` [PATCH 01/10] perf hist: Pass struct sample to __hists__add_entry() Namhyung Kim
2015-12-15 15:35 ` [PATCH 02/10] perf hist: Save raw_data/size for tracepoint events Namhyung Kim
2015-12-17 8:14 ` [PATCH v2.1] " Namhyung Kim
2015-12-17 12:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-12-15 15:35 ` [PATCH 03/10] tools lib traceevent: Factor out and export print_event_field[s] Namhyung Kim
2015-12-15 15:35 ` [PATCH 04/10] perf tools: Pass evlist to setup_sorting() Namhyung Kim
2015-12-15 15:35 ` [PATCH 05/10] perf tools: Add dynamic sort key for tracepoint events Namhyung Kim
2015-12-20 13:51 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-12-20 14:02 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-12-15 15:35 ` [PATCH 06/10] perf tools: Try to show pretty printed output for dynamic sort keys Namhyung Kim
2015-12-20 14:12 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-12-21 8:36 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-12-15 15:35 ` [PATCH 07/10] perf tools: Add 'trace' sort key Namhyung Kim
2015-12-15 15:35 ` [PATCH 08/10] perf tools: Add --raw-trace option Namhyung Kim
2015-12-20 14:58 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-12-21 8:44 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2015-12-22 6:57 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-12-22 16:19 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-12-15 15:35 ` [PATCH 09/10] perf tools: Make 'trace' sort key default for tracepoint events Namhyung Kim
2015-12-15 15:35 ` [PATCH 10/10] perf tools: Support shortcuts for events in dynamic sort keys Namhyung Kim
2015-12-17 0:17 ` [PATCHSET 00/10] perf tools: Support dynamic sort keys for tracepoints (v2) Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-12-17 7:56 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-12-17 12:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-12-21 14:26 [PATCHSET 00/10] perf tools: Support dynamic sort keys for tracepoints (v3) Namhyung Kim
2015-12-21 14:26 ` [PATCH 08/10] perf tools: Add --raw-trace option Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151221084441.GB22464@danjae.kornet \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®