From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751847AbbLUKhu (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2015 05:37:50 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:48167 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751792AbbLUKhs (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2015 05:37:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:43:58 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier To: MaJun Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] IRQ/Platform-MSI:Increase the maximum MSIs the MSI framework can support. Message-ID: <20151221104358.18734bc3@why.wild-wind.fr.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <1450667905-2968-1-git-send-email-majun258@huawei.com> References: <1450667905-2968-1-git-send-email-majun258@huawei.com> Organization: ARM Ltd X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 11:18:25 +0800 MaJun wrote: > From: Ma Jun > > The current MSI framework can only support 256 platform MSIs. > > But on Hisilicon platform, some network related devices has about 500 > wired interrupts. > > To support these devices, we need a new maximum value more than 256. > > Signed-off-by: Ma Jun > --- > drivers/base/platform-msi.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c > index a203896..9c00d3f 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c > +++ b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c > @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ > #include > #include > > -#define DEV_ID_SHIFT 24 > +#define DEV_ID_SHIFT 22 > #define MAX_DEV_MSIS (1 << (32 - DEV_ID_SHIFT)) > > /* If we bother doing that, why not directly aligning it with MSI-X and allow up to 2048 interrupts per device? It is only an extra bit, and that still leaves 21 bits worth of device IDs, while still having hwirq as an unsigned long (32bit on 32bit architectures). Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.