mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: jaccon.bastiaansen@gmail.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	will.deacon@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v4] arm: remove !CPU_V6 and !GENERIC_ATOMIC64 build dependencies for XEN
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:46:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151222144605.GJ8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1512221404060.3096@kaball.uk.xensource.com>

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:17:17PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Hello Russell,
> 
> Would you please consider this patch for the next merge window? It
> is a very old patch (March 2014) which has been left over.

This patch has some obvious problems...

> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index 34e1569..e09ed94 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -1807,8 +1807,7 @@ config XEN_DOM0
>  config XEN
>  	bool "Xen guest support on ARM"
>  	depends on ARM && AEABI && OF
> -	depends on CPU_V7 && !CPU_V6
> -	depends on !GENERIC_ATOMIC64
> +	depends on CPU_V7

How sure are we that this won't cause regressions?  How much testing
has been done with these changed dependencies?

> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h
> index 9732b8e..4103319 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h
> @@ -20,7 +20,29 @@
>  #define sync_test_and_clear_bit(nr, p)	_test_and_clear_bit(nr, p)
>  #define sync_test_and_change_bit(nr, p)	_test_and_change_bit(nr, p)
>  #define sync_test_bit(nr, addr)		test_bit(nr, addr)
> -#define sync_cmpxchg			cmpxchg
>  
> +static inline unsigned long sync_cmpxchg(volatile void *ptr,
> +										 unsigned long old,
> +										 unsigned long new)
> +{
> +	unsigned long oldval;
> +	int size = sizeof(*(ptr));

This is buggy.  You're doing sizeof(void) here, which on GCC will always
be 1:

   A consequence of this is that `sizeof' is also allowed on `void' and
  on function types, and returns 1.

> +
> +	smp_mb();
> +	switch (size) {
> +	case 1:
> +		oldval = __cmpxchg8(ptr, old, new);
> +		break;
> +	case 2:
> +		oldval = __cmpxchg16(ptr, old, new);
> +		break;

The ldrexb/ldrexh instructions are not available on ARMv6 CPUs.  __xchg()
and friends avoided these for ARMv6 CPUs, but this does not.

I'd expect anything that uses sync_cmpxchg() will fail to build when a
kernel including ARMv6 is attempted.

So... I don't think this patch is ready.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-22 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-22 14:17 Stefano Stabellini
2015-12-22 14:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2015-12-22 15:45   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-12-22 15:57     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-22 16:07       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-12-22 20:30 ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151222144605.GJ8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jaccon.bastiaansen@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®