From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751719AbcAABI1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Dec 2015 20:08:27 -0500 Received: from h2.hallyn.com ([78.46.35.8]:48272 "EHLO h2.hallyn.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751179AbcAABIZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Dec 2015 20:08:25 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 19:08:23 -0600 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Oleg Nesterov , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Richard Guy Briggs , "Eric W. Biederman" , "Serge E. Hallyn" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [RFC] is_global_init() called on global init sub-thread Message-ID: <20160101010823.GB26243@mail.hallyn.com> References: <20151230062542.GA605@swordfish> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151230062542.GA605@swordfish> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 03:25:42PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > Hello, > > re-upping https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2013-December/msg00086.html > > Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > :Because is_global_init() is only true for the main thread of /sbin/init. > : > :Just look at oom_unkillable_task(). It tries to not kill init. But, say, > :select_bad_process() can happily find a sub-thread of is_global_init() > :and still kill it. > > this is still the case, isn't it? at least in some -stable kernels. > is there (or was there) any reason this change has never been committed? > (I'm particularly interested in is_global_init()). ... seems like it makes sense. Can you remind us which init you're having to deal with? > static inline int is_global_init(struct task_struct *tsk) > { > - return tsk->pid == 1; > + return task_tgid_nr(tsk) == 1; > } > > -ss