From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, nab@linux-iscsi.org,
pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com, k.opasiak@samsung.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: a configfs update for 4.5, and the configfs tree question
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 07:46:51 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160105074651.5df5b835@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160104115101.GA26260@lst.de>
Hi Christoph,
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:51:01 +0100 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>
> Stephen, can you add
>
> git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/configfs.git for-next
>
> to for-next? It's currently emptry but will contain the two commits
> from the pending branch as soon as I get the signoff from Joel.
Added from today.
Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next. As
you may know, this is not a judgment of your code. The purpose of
linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window.
You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
been:
* submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
Signed-off-by,
* posted to the relevant mailing list,
* reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
* successfully unit tested, and
* destined for the current or next Linux merge window.
Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
sfr@canb.auug.org.au
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-04 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-24 14:51 Christoph Hellwig
2015-12-24 14:51 ` [PATCH] configfs: implement binary attributes Christoph Hellwig
2015-12-29 23:00 ` Joel Becker
2015-12-29 23:26 ` Krzysztof Opasiak
2015-12-30 8:51 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2015-12-29 23:37 ` Krzysztof Opasiak
2015-12-29 23:05 ` a configfs update for 4.5, and the configfs tree question Joel Becker
2016-01-04 11:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-01-04 12:37 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-01-04 20:46 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2016-01-05 4:04 ` Joel Becker
2016-01-06 17:31 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160105074651.5df5b835@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=k.opasiak@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®