From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752180AbcAFQ2z (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2016 11:28:55 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:38893 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751605AbcAFQ2x (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2016 11:28:53 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 16:28:30 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Rob Herring Cc: Laxman Dewangan , pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20160106162830.GZ6588@sirena.org.uk> References: <1452060922-24426-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <20160106121857.GW6588@sirena.org.uk> <568D064A.8080609@nvidia.com> <20160106123735.GX6588@sirena.org.uk> <20160106142521.GA11188@rob-hp-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+mQruWSI2c46YBtV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160106142521.GA11188@rob-hp-laptop> X-Cookie: APL hackers do it in the quad. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --+mQruWSI2c46YBtV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 08:25:21AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 12:37:35PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > I tried to roundoff to the next higher threshold when supported value (120 > > > or 140 degC) is not provided in driver. But it is fine to me to specify the > > > possible value setting here and DT binding doc. Will do on next patch. > > I don't really mind which you use so long as the documentation is clear. > I prefer that degrees are used rather than register values. The downside of that is that it does mean more validation code. --+mQruWSI2c46YBtV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWjUCtAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQH64H/iF5mu8nnHDonrb8BByN0cwy Cy+aREfyO2MyaCyzXoZ7yEC7pFLXlnRrwQ7tlT0wnc1xUPLGt3nt5dd9YZk4qS5A Vdreh+S3QJhuR464o8KGlv/+othlJaEPpMQSbIoJL4FDFWDaF5IzsralPX9g6Imu +ufNU8nG7NmU5LlxjnoZunm7MGUtV4CzB/nLIC5FL1YT1mBNYTCclR+QNuH4sVqN ja56NJQXgkYyRMcFk74Eaflk4uoIxTTjiKFv23bOY7rzdAoivHs22BoKSiYw4qz1 7T2v0nOp02iLFyK2/f2FvKp6CoCxtv5DAq6f/qUBNgQ+MLYhltwqrM1d4kYRgjE= =hW0A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+mQruWSI2c46YBtV--