From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Andrea Argangeli <andrea@kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] oom reaper: handle anonymous mlocked pages
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 09:14:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160107081402.GA27868@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452094975-551-3-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org>
On Wed 06-01-16 16:42:55, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Anonymous mappings
> are not visible by any other process so doing a munlock before unmap
> is safe to do from the semantic point of view.
I was too conservative here. I have completely forgoten about the lazy
mlock handling during try_to_unmap which would keep the page mlocked if
there is an mlocked vma mapping that page. So we can safely do what I
was proposing originally. I hope I am not missing anything now. Here is
the replacement patch
---
>From 9aa92fc1c7f0f1c55d2efab0239dbb10a9dce001 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 10:48:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] oom reaper: handle mlocked pages
__oom_reap_vmas current skips over all mlocked vmas because they need a
special treatment before they are unmapped. This is primarily done for
simplicity. There is no reason to skip over them and reduce the amount
of reclaimed memory. This is safe from the semantic point of view
because try_to_unmap_one during rmap walk would keep tell the reclaim
to cull the page back and mlock it again.
munlock_vma_pages_all is also safe to be called from the oom reaper
context because it doesn't sit on any locks but mmap_sem (for read).
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 12 ++++--------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 1ece40b94725..0e4af31db96f 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -445,13 +445,6 @@ static bool __oom_reap_vmas(struct mm_struct *mm)
continue;
/*
- * mlocked VMAs require explicit munlocking before unmap.
- * Let's keep it simple here and skip such VMAs.
- */
- if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
- continue;
-
- /*
* Only anonymous pages have a good chance to be dropped
* without additional steps which we cannot afford as we
* are OOM already.
@@ -461,9 +454,12 @@ static bool __oom_reap_vmas(struct mm_struct *mm)
* we do not want to block exit_mmap by keeping mm ref
* count elevated without a good reason.
*/
- if (vma_is_anonymous(vma) || !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED))
+ if (vma_is_anonymous(vma) || !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
+ if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
+ munlock_vma_pages_all(vma);
unmap_page_range(&tlb, vma, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end,
&details);
+ }
}
tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb, 0, -1);
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
--
2.6.4
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-07 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-06 15:42 [PATCH 0/2 -mm] oom reaper v4 Michal Hocko
2016-01-06 15:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm, oom: introduce oom reaper Michal Hocko
2016-01-07 11:23 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-07 12:30 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-11 22:54 ` Andrew Morton
2016-01-12 8:16 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-28 1:28 ` David Rientjes
2016-01-28 21:42 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 3:02 ` David Rientjes
2016-02-02 8:57 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 11:48 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-02-02 22:55 ` David Rientjes
2016-02-02 22:51 ` David Rientjes
2016-02-03 10:31 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-06 15:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] oom reaper: handle anonymous mlocked pages Michal Hocko
2016-01-07 8:14 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-01-11 12:42 ` [PATCH 3/2] oom: clear TIF_MEMDIE after oom_reaper managed to unmap the address space Michal Hocko
2016-01-11 16:52 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-01-11 17:46 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-15 10:58 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-18 4:35 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-18 10:22 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-26 16:38 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-28 11:24 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-28 21:51 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-28 22:26 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-28 22:36 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-28 22:33 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160107081402.GA27868@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrea@kernel.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome