mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, petkan@mip-labs.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 02/15] X.509: Don't treat self-signed keys specially
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 18:33:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160108183335.25960.5138.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160108183319.25960.49807.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

Trust for a self-signed certificate can normally only be determined by
whether we obtained it from a trusted location (ie. it was built into the
kernel at compile time), so there's not really any point in checking it -
we could verify that the signature is valid, but it doesn't really tell us
anything if the signature checks out.

However, there's a bug in the code determining whether a certificate is
self-signed or not - if they have neither AKID nor SKID then we just assume
that the cert is self-signed, which may not be true.

Given this, remove the code that treats self-signed certs specially when it
comes to evaluating trustability and attempt to evaluate them as ordinary
signed certificates.  We then expect self-signed certificates to fail the
trustability check and be marked as untrustworthy in x509_key_preparse().

Note that there is the possibility of the trustability check on a
self-signed cert then succeeding.  This is most likely to happen when a
duplicate of the certificate is already on the trust keyring - in which
case it shouldn't be a problem.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c |   25 ++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c
index 2a44b3752471..25455567ac06 100644
--- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c
+++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c
@@ -255,6 +255,9 @@ static int x509_validate_trust(struct x509_certificate *cert,
 	struct key *key;
 	int ret = 1;
 
+	if (!cert->akid_id && !cert->akid_skid)
+		return 1;
+
 	if (!trust_keyring)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
@@ -312,17 +315,21 @@ static int x509_key_preparse(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep)
 	cert->pub->algo = pkey_algo[cert->pub->pkey_algo];
 	cert->pub->id_type = PKEY_ID_X509;
 
-	/* Check the signature on the key if it appears to be self-signed */
-	if ((!cert->akid_skid && !cert->akid_id) ||
-	    asymmetric_key_id_same(cert->skid, cert->akid_skid) ||
-	    asymmetric_key_id_same(cert->id, cert->akid_id)) {
-		ret = x509_check_signature(cert->pub, cert); /* self-signed */
-		if (ret < 0)
-			goto error_free_cert;
-	} else if (!prep->trusted) {
+	/* See if we can derive the trustability of this certificate.
+	 *
+	 * When it comes to self-signed certificates, we cannot evaluate
+	 * trustedness except by the fact that we obtained it from a trusted
+	 * location.  So we just rely on x509_validate_trust() failing in this
+	 * case.
+	 *
+	 * Note that there's a possibility of a self-signed cert matching a
+	 * cert that we have (most likely a duplicate that we already trust) -
+	 * in which case it will be marked trusted.
+	 */
+	if (!prep->trusted) {
 		ret = x509_validate_trust(cert, get_system_trusted_keyring());
 		if (!ret)
-			prep->trusted = 1;
+			prep->trusted = true;
 	}
 
 	/* Propose a description */

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-08 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-08 18:33 [RFC PATCH 00/15] KEYS: Restrict additions to 'trusted' keyrings David Howells
2016-01-08 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH 01/15] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring David Howells
2016-01-08 18:33 ` David Howells [this message]
2016-01-08 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH 03/15] KEYS: Generalise system_verify_data() to provide access to internal content David Howells
2016-01-08 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH 04/15] PKCS#7: Make trust determination dependent on contents of trust keyring David Howells
2016-01-08 18:33 ` [RFC PATCH 05/15] KEYS: Add an alloc flag to convey the builtinness of a key David Howells
2016-01-08 18:34 ` [RFC PATCH 06/15] KEYS: Add a facility to restrict new links into a keyring David Howells
2016-01-08 18:34 ` [RFC PATCH 07/15] KEYS: Allow authentication data to be stored in an asymmetric key David Howells
2016-01-08 18:34 ` [RFC PATCH 08/15] KEYS: Add identifier pointers to public_key_signature struct David Howells
2016-01-08 18:34 ` [RFC PATCH 09/15] X.509: Retain the key verification data David Howells
2016-01-08 18:34 ` [RFC PATCH 10/15] X.509: Extract signature digest and make self-signed cert checks earlier David Howells
2016-01-08 18:34 ` [RFC PATCH 11/15] PKCS#7: Make the signature a pointer rather than embedding it David Howells
2016-01-08 18:34 ` [RFC PATCH 12/15] X.509: Move the trust validation code out to its own file David Howells
2016-01-08 18:34 ` [RFC PATCH 13/15] KEYS: Generalise x509_request_asymmetric_key() David Howells
2016-01-08 18:35 ` [RFC PATCH 14/15] KEYS: Move the point of trust determination to __key_link() David Howells
2016-01-08 18:35 ` [RFC PATCH 15/15] KEYS: Remove KEY_FLAG_TRUSTED David Howells
2016-01-08 18:54 ` [RFC PATCH 00/15] KEYS: Restrict additions to 'trusted' keyrings Mimi Zohar
2016-01-08 19:18   ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-12  0:38   ` David Howells
2016-01-12  2:43     ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-12  0:37 ` David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160108183335.25960.5138.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=petkan@mip-labs.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®