From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760903AbcAKWfv (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:35:51 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:51633 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760825AbcAKWft (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:35:49 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:35:48 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Mike Kravetz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Hugh Dickins , Naoya Horiguchi , Hillf Danton , Davidlohr Bueso , Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlbfs: Unmap pages if page fault raced with hole punch Message-Id: <20160111143548.f6dc084529530b05b03b8f0c@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1452119824-32715-1-git-send-email-mike.kravetz@oracle.com> References: <1452119824-32715-1-git-send-email-mike.kravetz@oracle.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 14:37:04 -0800 Mike Kravetz wrote: > Page faults can race with fallocate hole punch. If a page fault happens > between the unmap and remove operations, the page is not removed and > remains within the hole. This is not the desired behavior. The race > is difficult to detect in user level code as even in the non-race > case, a page within the hole could be faulted back in before fallocate > returns. If userfaultfd is expanded to support hugetlbfs in the future, > this race will be easier to observe. > > If this race is detected and a page is mapped, the remove operation > (remove_inode_hugepages) will unmap the page before removing. The unmap > within remove_inode_hugepages occurs with the hugetlb_fault_mutex held > so that no other faults will be processed until the page is removed. > > The (unmodified) routine hugetlb_vmdelete_list was moved ahead of > remove_inode_hugepages to satisfy the new reference. > > ... > > --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c > +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c > > ... > > @@ -395,37 +431,43 @@ static void remove_inode_hugepages(struct inode *inode, loff_t lstart, > mapping, next, 0); > mutex_lock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]); > > - lock_page(page); > - if (likely(!page_mapped(page))) { hm, what are the locking requirements for page_mapped()? > - bool rsv_on_error = !PagePrivate(page); > - /* > - * We must free the huge page and remove > - * from page cache (remove_huge_page) BEFORE > - * removing the region/reserve map > - * (hugetlb_unreserve_pages). In rare out > - * of memory conditions, removal of the > - * region/reserve map could fail. Before > - * free'ing the page, note PagePrivate which > - * is used in case of error. > - */ > - remove_huge_page(page); And remove_huge_page(). > - freed++; > - if (!truncate_op) { > - if (unlikely(hugetlb_unreserve_pages( > - inode, next, > - next + 1, 1))) > - hugetlb_fix_reserve_counts( > - inode, rsv_on_error); > - } > > ... >